
Just like some popular philosophers, William James’ also has its theory about the self and it is also categorie into two categories. According to him, the self is categoried as the “me-self” and the I-self”. It is not difficult to become captivated by William James’ conception of “self as knower and self as known.” Because after all, the distinction of self is in terms of I and me is in some fashion common-sensical. For example, “I was talking to myself yesterday…” However, the definition of him about the self differs in a more wider scope in comparation of other philosophers’ theories. The Me-self refers to the sub categories of the self: social self, material self and spiritual self. James pointed that individuals simply cannot be all possible selves in all possible ways because the actions that arise from differing selves differ and are basically incompatible. Hence, the conflict of the different Me’s. In short, we exhibit a different version of ourselves depending on the situation and the person whom we are talking to – friends, church mates or parents and relatives. Consequently, he pointed that one who wishes to seek his truest and deepest self must know and review the list of all the selves he wishes to be truthfully and pick out the one on which to take his salvation.
This is when the “I-self” comes in. It refers to the purest and truest version of the self. James belief in God permeates his psychology and plays an important role in his understanding of self particularly of the “I”. According to him, it’s the primitive part of us that identifies our uniqueness from one another.
On the other hand, Carl Rogers, a human psychologist, implify that for a person to “grow” , they need an environment that provides them with openness and self disclosure, acceptance (being seen with unconditional positive regard), and empathy (being listened to and understood). His theory were quite similar to Abraham Maslow’s that the self strives to reach self actualization. If the self grew further on its goal, the self will become narcotic. According to him, the self concept which is the image of the self has two concepts; the real self and the ideal self. He believed that for a person to achieve self actualization they must be in a state of congruence. This means that self- actualization occurs when a person’s “ideal self” (i.e., who they would like to be) is congruent with their actual behavior (real self). Rogers describe an individual who is actualizing as a fully functioning person. The main determinant of whether we will become self- actualized is childhood experience.